After weeks of rehearsal building up to the performance, my partner Troy and I did our physical theatre assessment which went very well, giving us a score of 9 for our preparation, and an 8 for our performance. We were both content with this grade, as we felt like it truly reflected the amount of effort we had put into the performance.
I felt like one of our strongest points was our story and characters throughout, as we created a narrative that correlated to the feel of the performance. As already mentioned in the rehearsal notes, our storyline was that Troy was a predator and I was the prey, which he ends up with catching me at the end and killing me. This idea came from our physicality; he is naturally extremely strong and I am much weaker than him, so we decided to enhance this and have him pulling me around and limiting my movements. To go with this story, we had lots of counter-balance lifts with me continually trying to get away from him and in particular, created an emotional part where he is standing over me holding onto my hips only, and I am running, trying to get out of his grasp but I am not making any ground. We had positive feedback from our peers in terms of the story, as they felt it was very moving and difficult to watch, which was the effect that we wanted to create.
Another thing that worked well during the performance was the ergonomic flow of the routine. Although we had rehearsed a lot, we never choreographed a part of the routine, just did lots of improvising sessions and then took the best parts from the improvisation. Even in the final performance we did some movements that we had not done previously, as we opened up our bodies to do the talking, rather than thinking about what move should come next, as we thought this would look quite mechanical. We had come up with a beginning and end for the piece and certain clusters of moves that we could do if our bodies appeared in the positions, and this seemed to work very well for us. Troy and I have a good chemistry, and have spent a lot of time working with each other so seem to be able to communicate without using words when we are devising physical theatre. This may not work for every assessment, and I will have to be conscious of who I am working with and the style that works best for us, but in this instance, we felt this was the best way to achieve the best material, and it seemed to pay off.
However, there was a downside to improvising most of the routine, as we began very quickly with a fast pace to our movements which we never found time to slow down. Instead of there being light and shade to the movements, I felt that they were all very fast paced whereas it might have been better to find a time of slow and controlled movements. There was space in the relationship of our characters to find a time of stillness and pause, but we seemed to ignore this when we were caught up in the moment of performing. I think we also could have made more eye contact with one another, as in the performance, upon reflection I realise I was looking down for most of the routine, but it would have been nice to look directly into each others' eyes and find the battle there as well as with the rest of our bodies.
Another thing that worked well during the performance was the ergonomic flow of the routine. Although we had rehearsed a lot, we never choreographed a part of the routine, just did lots of improvising sessions and then took the best parts from the improvisation. Even in the final performance we did some movements that we had not done previously, as we opened up our bodies to do the talking, rather than thinking about what move should come next, as we thought this would look quite mechanical. We had come up with a beginning and end for the piece and certain clusters of moves that we could do if our bodies appeared in the positions, and this seemed to work very well for us. Troy and I have a good chemistry, and have spent a lot of time working with each other so seem to be able to communicate without using words when we are devising physical theatre. This may not work for every assessment, and I will have to be conscious of who I am working with and the style that works best for us, but in this instance, we felt this was the best way to achieve the best material, and it seemed to pay off.
However, there was a downside to improvising most of the routine, as we began very quickly with a fast pace to our movements which we never found time to slow down. Instead of there being light and shade to the movements, I felt that they were all very fast paced whereas it might have been better to find a time of slow and controlled movements. There was space in the relationship of our characters to find a time of stillness and pause, but we seemed to ignore this when we were caught up in the moment of performing. I think we also could have made more eye contact with one another, as in the performance, upon reflection I realise I was looking down for most of the routine, but it would have been nice to look directly into each others' eyes and find the battle there as well as with the rest of our bodies.
In terms of improvements that should be made, I think we should have come up with a song much earlier and stuck to it, as we felt restrained by the fact we were not allowed to have a song with words due to it being too directing. This led us to spending along time changing the music that was accompanying our piece. I feel like if we had stuck with a song from the beginning of the rehearsal period, we would have formed a piece which was more coherent with the music.
Overall, it was a very successful first performance that rounded of an enjoyable first term of physical theatre. There were many more positives than negatives and I hope to continue to put as much effort into the next term as I have in this one.